Brad Stevens Make a Good Celtics Team Very Dangerous

Rewind to opening night in the NBA. Gordon Hayward had the latest gruesome leg injury and the Cleveland Cavaliers ruined Kyrie Irving’s Celtic debut. With Hayward out for the year, many immediately left the Celtics for dead and were ready to name the Cavs Eastern Conference champions yet again. After that, Boston lost to Milwaukee to drop to 0-2 and it looked like Hayward’s absence would indeed be missed this year.

All Brad Stevens and company did from there was rattle off 12 straight wins and now own the best record in the NBA. And while their opening night opponents are still struggling to find their identity, Boston seems to have theirs figured out. One large reason why is the man on their sidelines.

Say what you want about the top coaches in the NBA. Greg Popovich has been a mad genius for years. Steve Kerr and Golden State have lost just 24 games in two seasons. You can mention Thibodeau, D’Antoni, and Spoelstra. None of them have been as impressive as Brad Stevens has so far this season.

Imagine winning the Eastern Conference last season over the mighty Cavaliers. Then imagine trading your best player, who was the heart and soul of your club. Imagine trading away your defensive specialist on the perimeter. You replace them with two all-stars, but you lose one of them on opening night. You now have one all-star, who grant it is one of the best players in the league, and a back court of young, unproven players. Couple that with a thin front court. That doesn’t sound like a recipe for sbest record in the NBA.

Now I know that is exaggerated to an extent. The cupboard is not empty in Boston. They do have Kyrie Irving, Al Horford and two lottery picks in Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum. It’s not that they are winning that is the impressive part. It’s how they are winning. They come from behind (see their game against Oklahoma City). They win the close game (25% of their wins have been a one possession game). And they’ve even won at less than full strength (Irving and Horford have each missed games).

Brad Stevens has this team competing. He has them playing very balanced and serving their roles. Irving is the team’s leading scorer, but six other players are scoring 10 points plus a game, if you include Marcus Morris’s 12.2 in just five games. Horford leads the team in rebounding, but league sophomore Jaylen Brown chips in almost seven a game. Aron Baynes, the definition of a role player, adds six a game as well. Their assist leader? Marcus Smart. The guy everyone was worried would lose his place on this team. He also adds 1.67 steals per game, second to Kyrie’s 1.92.

Top to bottom Stevens is getting production from their guys on the floor. And the result is win after win. That’s the biggest thing a coach can do in the NBA; Get his team to buy into their roles and play as one, cohesive unit. Not bad for a guy that many thought would flame out after a couple seasons, as most college-to-NBA coaches do.

I’m not crowning the Celtics 2018 NBA Champions three weeks into the season. I’m not saying give Brad Stevens the Coach of the Year award yet either. There is far too much season. The Pistons are legit and the Cavs will be scary come playoff time when they get their point guard healthy. A lot can still happen. But right now it doesn’t seem to matter who Boston throws out on the court. Brad Stevens has them winning.

Kyrie to the Celtics Changes NBA East


Boston wants to dominate the 2020s.

Ainge knows that while LeBron remains in Cleveland, he shouldn’t sell the farm for a short term upgrade.

Boston is saving their assets for a true superstar – think Anthony Davis.

Ainge knows Golden State is unbeatable for the next 2-3 years.

These were the refrains we heard for the past few years. Boston had the most coveted assets in the league after fleecing Brooklyn out of three first round picks. They were rumored to be potential destinations for all of the stars on the trading block for the past few years, but they continued to pass on players such as Demarcus Cousins, Paul George, and Jimmy Butler. It frustrated fans, but it made sense. Why trade young players and picks now when they almost certainly can’t put you past LeBron or the Warriors?

Celtics GM Danny Ainge stayed the course, even when public pressure to make a move mounted. The ping-pong balls rewarded his patience when the Celtics won the draft lottery in May 2017. After moving down, they still got their guy – Jayson Tatum – and added him to a roster with talented prospect Jaylen Brown. With Tatum, Brown, young superstar coach Brad Stevens, and Brooklyn’s first round pick in 2018, the Celtics were in incredible position to field a dominant roster in the 2020s.

By now, you already know that the Celtics traded Isaiah Thomas, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, and Brooklyn’s 2018 first round pick for Kyrie Irving. The move makes sense on some levels. As well as Thomas played last year, he is simply not as good as Irving. The Celtics were leery about paying a 5’8”, 29 year old point guard a max contract in the summer of 2018. Crowder has been a contributer, but his absence frees up more minutes for Brown and Tatum. But the offseason addition of Gordon Hayward may have tipped the scales more than any other factor in favor of making this trade. He too plays the same position as Crowder. But more importantly, Ainge thinks Boston can make the Finals this year.

The Celtics are positioned for the 2020s, but they are pretty damn good right now. Hayward, and to a lesser extent Al Horford, give the Celtics All-Star caliber players in their prime (the back end of Horford’s). Adding Irving makes the team better this year. All reports indicate that LeBron’s relationship with Cleveland ownership is shattered. It’s not hard to envision a scenario where he mentally checks out like he did during the 2010 playoff series versus the Celtics and the 2011 Finals versus the Mavs. If so, the Celtics are poised to take advantage. Then Boston is one injury of a key player on Golden State away from winning the Finals. It’s unlikely, but only the Warriors, Spurs, and Cavs still have a better chance of winning the 2018 Finals than the Celtics do. That has to count for something.

At age 25, Kyrie is right in the “sweet spot” where he can help the Celtics make the Finals this year and can still contribute long term. Horford will be a dinosaur by the time Boston’s teenagers (and future picks) are ready to contribute, and Hayward will be getting long in the tooth as well. If they can lock Kyrie up long term, he can be the point guard of the present and the future. Ainge took a big risk by finally dealing one of the Brooklyn picks. If it ends up as the top pick in what is shaping up to be a top-heavy draft, he may come to regret it. Marvin Bagley in particular has been called a once in a generation talent.

Boston payed a hefty price for a player who had to be traded. But they gave up players who were ultimately expendable for them, either this year or next. Giving up the Brooklyn pick definitely hurts – especially after George and Butler were acquired for so little – but Boston undoubtedly got better this year, and draft picks can be uncertain. Check back in about fifteen years to see who won this trade. Maybe the Celtics will have multiple Larry O’Brien trophies to show for it, or maybe Marvin Bagley will be remembered as the greatest Cav of all time.

Biggest Winners and Losers of the 2017 NBA Draft First Round

markelle fultz nba draft adam silver

NBA Draft Winners and Losers

Round one of the NBA Draft is in the books. A lot will be predicted before the NBA season even tips off. Players 18-22 years old will be put under a microscope all Summer long. We aren’t wasting any time,let’s dig in with our initial Winners and Losers from Round one of the 2017 NBA Draft.


Winner: Philadelphia 76ers

The Sixers were a winner Tuesday when they traded up for the #1 overall pick. They promptly set their sights on Markelle Fultz, and for right reason. Fultz flew as under the radar as any player could last season at Washington and drew his share of criticism. Facts are that Fultz is one of three players to average over 20 points as a freshman, joining Michael Beasley and Kevin Durant. He brings great athleticism, play making ability and scoring to a young Sixer team.

jimmy butler chicago bulls

Loser: Chicago Bulls

The Bulls made a splash early in the draft when they traded Jimmy Butler to Minnesota for Zach LaVine, Kris Dunn and the #16 pick in the Draft for the #7 pick. With that pick the Bulls selected Lauri Markkanen out of Arizona. Markkanen is a streaky shooter, but when he’s hot he’s as hot as anyone. Still raw, he will need to develop more before he makes a big impact. Popular opinion is the Bulls did not get enough back for Butler, and I can’t say I disagree. Between questions of LaVine’s healthy knee and shipping the 16th pick, it seems like the Bulls could have gotten more for a player of Butler’s caliber.

Winner: Sacramento Kings

The Kings had two Top 10 picks going into the Draft and came out with three first round picks. They swapped the #10 for the 15th and 20th picks, totaling a return of DeAron Fox, Justin Jackson and Harry Giles in Round 1. Fox is the quickest player in the Draft and fills a huge holes for the Kings. They got a perimeter shooter in Jackson, the ACC Player of the Year, and a potential steal in Giles. Giles was a top recruit coming out of high school, but an ACL injury caused his lone season at Duke to be underwhelming. If healthy, Giles could prove to be a dynamic post player for Sacramento.

deandre fox malik monk nba draft sacramento kings

Winner: Charlotte Hornets

Malik Monk fell drastically in the first round. A potential Top 5 pick, Monk slide all the way down to Charlotte at 11. What they got in Monk is someone who can score in bunches. Monk has the potential to be the best scorer in this Draft, something that should not be taken lightly considering the names at the top. A back court of Kemba Walker and Malik Monk is a lethal one for Charlotte. While he needs to clean up other aspects of his game, Michael Jordan and company got great value with their first rounder.

danny ainge boston celtics nba draft trade

Loser: Boston Celtics

It’s tough to say the Boston Celtics are losers when they walk away with a player like Jayson Tatum, but I’m doing it. Tatum is a great scorer, and he showed that at Duke. But when you look at how Boston’s season ended last year, it was an inability defend Cleveland’s scorers. Kyrie ate up Isaiah Thomas and no one could match up with the physical specimen that is Lebron James. Boston decided to pass on Fultz and declare IT their Point Guard, fine. The bigger issue was passing on Josh Jackson. While Jackson can’t shoot as well as Tatum, he is better everywhere else. He is an extremely good defender, can rebound and block shots. I think Tatum can be a great scorer in the League, but passing on Fultz and Jackson will haunt the Celtics down the road.

Honorable Mention: Oklahoma City Thunder

The Thunder didn’t steal the show with their selection of Terrance Ferguson, but they filled a big need. Like Brandon Jennings and Emmanuel Mudiay before him, Ferguson’s stock dropped a little when he went overseas to play in Australia instead of playing at Arizona. However, OKC obtained an outside shooter they needed. Joining Russell Westbrook and Victor Oladipo in the back court, not much spot light will be on Ferguson initially, but he will be able to spread the floor, something Andre Roberson failed to do last year.

These are gut reaction first takes. There’s a good chance one of these opinions will become laughable in a couple of years. Only time will tell however. For now, here’s to waiting for October. Give us your thoughts in the comment section and follow Hoop Group Insider this Summer as we give you all the NBA news you need.

NBA Draft Lottery Prediction: Boston Celtics

Boston Celtics- #3 Pick 2017 NBA Draft

Needs: Wing Scoring, Depth at the 3/4 Position

The Pick: Jayson Tatum

Other Options: Josh Jackson (Kansas), Jonathan Isaac (Florida State)

The Celtics lack of talent on the wing was exposed in their series with the Cavs, when LeBron James absolutely dominated Boston. Granted, he is (arguably) the best player of all-time, the Celtics will need to figure out a way to counter LeBron for the next several years.

Since it is nearly impossible to stop James, the best way for the Celtics to counteract him is to keeping pace with his offensive output. That is why the Celtics are looking to sign Gordon Hayward, and that is why they should take Tatum over Jackson, despite most regarding Jackson as the better talent.

Tatum averaged impressive numbers at Duke, dropping over 16 points per game and hauling in over 7 rebounds. His 6-11 wingspan and slightly larger frame gives him versatility to play the 4 position and add depth to the front-court as well, something that Josh Jackson cannot provide.

Tatum can score in a multitude of ways and has great offensive instincts. He is dangerous driving to the lane or posting up on the block, and he has been making significant strides to improve his outside shooting. Jackson did perform slightly better from beyond the arc, but if there is anything to be learned from the progression of NBA talent, it is that shooting can be taught, while size and instinct are hard to change.